Supreme Court Picks: Top 3 Candidates (Highlights of Each Potential Justice)

As a pro-choice advocate who co-exists with people who’re pro-life and as someone who does not mistakenly believe that every one of those pro-lifers is an irrational asshole (as a shocking number of the left seem to believe), hopefully I’ve provided a little bit of insight on these judges for anyone who does have concerns. And given how each of them (and, really, everyone else on Trump’s list) are being viciously misrepresented in most of the media and have been since Justice Kennedy announced his resignation, hopefully I’ve been able to offer a bit of clarity.

With all the fake, distorted, spun out news surrounding all of these nominees I felt it was kind of important to give a more down to earth, honest assessment based on who they are and what their records reflect in each of their respective careers. As opposed to the rampant, virtually unchecked mis-characterizations of the mainstream news media. This is just my take, my own spin, honestly; but hopefully it’s a little closer to objective truth.

Sutter Media

President Trump is expected to announce his pick among the possible candidates to be the newest Supreme Court Justice on Monday, and while a week ago the list was roughly five names long it has since (allegedly) been narrowed down to 2 or 3 likely nominee’s.

  • Amy Coney Barrett
  • Brett Kavanaugh
  • Raymond Kethledge

With Justice Kennedy stepping down Trump has gained more leverage against Democrats in the 2018 mid-terms, upping the ante on all sides and using it to build on the momentum that already had the Republicans eclipsing Democrats in the polling ahead of this years upcoming elections. Having already effectively countered and overcome their “ripping families apart” horse shit narrative – a desperate, obvious Hail Mary effort on their part – he and the GOP as it exists under his leadership now have the upper hand.

Assuming, that is, that we the voters turn out and vote for…

View original post 4,266 more words

Advertisements

Watch: America Is Superior To Any Other Country, Change My Mind

We got our first taste of this “Change My Mind” episode when Crowder confronted “Firebomb Lady”. As it turns out, some crazy bitch thought it would be cute to tweet out the location of him and his crew when they were doing a sit down for a previous episode for the same series for the purpose of inciting people to fire bomb his van.

And she didn’t leave herself room to claim otherwise, following up the first tweet with a 2nd to clarify that yes, she did in fact mean people could, and should, firebomb his van.

He confronted her at this DNC ‘convention’ thing in Texas right around the time they were shooting for the episode I’m featuring here (hence the same outfit in both vids) and brought along a poster board with her face and print outs of her tweets, which turned out to be a good idea since she initially tried playing dumb, pretending not to know anything about it, and made (and all her fellow activists) look like total assholes.

Sutter Media

We got our first taste of this “Change My Mind” episode when Crowder confronted “Firebomb Lady”. As it turns out, some crazy bitch thought it would be cute to tweet out the location of him and his crew when they were doing a sit down for a previous episode for the same series for the purpose of inciting people to fire bomb his van.

And she didn’t leave herself room to claim otherwise, following up the first tweet with a 2nd to clarify that yes, she did in fact mean people could, and should, firebomb his van.

He confronted her at this DNC ‘convention’ thing in Texas right around the time they were shooting for the episode I’m featuring here (hence the same outfit in both vids) and brought along a poster board with her face and print outs of her tweets, which turned out to be a good…

View original post 25 more words

Democrats Have Weaponized Our District Courts & Often Abuse Their Authority In Efforts to Obstruct ‘America 1st’ Policies

Justice Thomas, in his concurring opinion with the decision to uphold President Trump’s travel ban, suggested that these judges are abusing their power. I’ve been saying that since the first 9th Circuit judge blocked the original travel ban with one of the injunctions referred to above. That was one of the first times this new pattern of blatant judicial activism started to rear its head, and sadly it was the start of a trend.

On the one hand it’s nice to have someone as high profile as a Supreme Court Justice voicing the same observations I’ve made since Trump won the presidency but on the other, that someone in his position should have to warn against power grabs and abuses of power throughout the lower courts is… somewhat alarming. It’s got so common as to merit the attention of someone sitting on the Supreme Court, and if I had to venture a guess I’d bet he’s not the only one who’s noticed this judicial overreach and abuse.

Sutter Media

On Tuesday Justice Clarence Thomas raised concerns about the increasingly common use of nationwide injunctions by federal trial court judges to combat Donald Trump’s policies and to halt laws the American people support – laws that Trump is attempting to enforce, in line with his responsibilities as chief executive and as the top law enforcement official, and that were passed legally through congress. The problem is, these judges only have jurisdiction within their respective local districts.

…via Lifezette:

It has been a favorite tactic of liberal activist groups that fancy themselves part of the so-called resistance confronting President Donald Trump. If plaintiffs can get a U.S. District Court judge to grant an injunction and apply it nationwide, they can gum up Trump’s policies for months or longer — even if they ultimately lose the underlying case.

This is what happened Tuesday when the high court ruled 5-4 to uphold…

View original post 594 more words

Illegal Immigrant Found Guilty of Murdering Former Co-Worker & Kidnapping Her 6 Day Old Baby

This kind of thing is happening more often and the crimes foreign nationals are permitted to get away with are getting more severe, and all in the name of “protecting families” and having “compassion”. My question is where’s the compassion for people like Laura Abarca, for her family or for that matter Kate Steinle and her friends and family? Were they not “separated” from their families or do they just not count?

Gavin Newsom says they don’t, and so do most public officials with a “D” next to their name. And that’s not to say that voters registered as “Democrat” in this state don’t care, I don’t make the mistake of assuming all those who disagree with me must be monsters if they don’t things my way, but I am saying the people who you’re voting for, and who represent your Party, don’t care at all about Americans being murdered by foreigners.

You need to wake up to that fact, and you need to consider your vote in the 2018 mid-terms in light of that. Democrat voters, please try to recognize, the representatives of the party you’ve chosen to affiliate yourself with does not have your interests in mind. At all. Stop trying to ignore all the evidence that says as much, stop trying to convince yourself that it’s not out of corruption, that they mean well, they’re just dumb. Even if that were true, that’s some massive fucking deficiencies you’re excusing away; even if it’s the most innocent of all possible reasons why these people suck at public service, we’re long past the point where you should have begun to reassess your support of them. California, whether they mean well or not, is being run into the fucking ground by Democrats.

Sutter Media

Yesenia Sesmas, 36, is an illegal immigrant who faked pregnancy for months following the loss of her own unborn baby before killing a former co-worker, 27 year old Laura Abarca, and abducting the victims child with the intent to raise the baby as her own.

…via AOL News:

An undocumented immigrant living in Texas was found guilty of killing her former co-worker in Kansas and abducting the victim’s newborn baby.

Yesenia Sesmas, who also faked her own pregnancy after losing her unborn child, faces life in prison plus additional time when she is sentenced next month for the slaying of 27-year-old Laura Abarca.

While the douche bags over at AOL insist on using minced words and politically correct language, softening the tone by referring to her as an undocumented immigrant instead of an illegal immigrant, I have no such hang ups. Nor (in this case) does Fox News:

View original post 1,138 more words

Dinesh D’Souza Gives 1st Interview After Being Pardoned By President Trump

He apparently didn’t know beforehand that he was about to receive a Presidential pardon but in being informed of it, he was told it was given because of how he was singled out and penalized not just for the crime – which would have amounted to a small fine if the law had been applied to him as it’s applied to anyone else who violates it – but for the political beliefs he has and for criticizing Barack Obama’s administration at the time. Had it been otherwise, he would have simply had to pay a fine approximately of the same value as the amount of money he illegally donated, as every other individual charged with this same crime has been made to pay. He would not have received a jail sentence of any kind if the law had been applied evenly; no one before or since him has ever been imprisoned for committing that exact same crime. No one.

Ever.

Think about that. Better yet, research the matter for yourself, look into what his work (regarding politics) looked like at the time, look at what exactly he did illegally, look at what his sentence was, and compare it to other similar case. You will find that he was penalized far out of proportion of the crime he admitted to committing (out of ignorance of the law), and wildly out of proportion to any penalties leveled at those who’ve broken the same law. Hopefully in researching it yourself you’ll be able to see how corrupt the system had to have been, how politicized our judicial and law enforcement agencies had to have been, for this to have even been possible in the first place.

President Obama and Secretary Clinton criminalized the way our government operates, running it the same way Al Capone ran his empire. Between the pay to play activities of the Clinton’s and the blatant, unapologetic weaponization of branches of government against the DNC’s political opposition under Barack Obama’s presidency, the question is no longer “was our government corrupted?” but instead, “how badly was it corrupted?”

Dinesh himself touches on this a little bit in his interview, and a lot in his present day work in showcasing the sordid (arguably sinister) history of the Democrat party and how they;ve desperately worked to bury it and rewrite their own factual track record with minorities (particularly African Americans, given that they founded the KKK). I would encourage you to dig into that history on your own though, and to see how it might explain a lot of what’s been going on with the Democrat party in modern times.

Sutter Media

I’m a day late but I said I’d feature Dinesh’s first interview on Fox News after he was pardoned by President Trump, so late or not, here’s the (brief) interview he gave:

He apparently didn’t know beforehand that he was about to receive a Presidential pardon but in being informed of it, he was told it was given because of how he was singled out and penalized not just for the crime – which would have amounted to a small fine if the law had been applied to him as it’s applied to anyone else who violates it – but for the political beliefs he has and for criticizing Barack Obama’s administration at the time. Had it been otherwise, he would have simply had to pay a fine approximately of the same value as the amount of money he illegally donated, as every other individual charged with this same crime…

View original post 453 more words